President Biden’s Antitrust Gamble
August 9, 2024, 8:34 AM
As President Biden’s term is nearing its end, did his aggressive antitrust agenda bear fruit? Axinn attorneys Daniel Bitton and Carol Liu recently published an article, Biden’s Antitrust Gamble, taking stock of the Biden Administration’s antitrust scorecard to date.
Mixed record in merger enforcement. The statistics show that Biden has delivered on its promise to settle fewer and litigate more of its merger challenges. The results have been mixed. Where it challenged mergers on conventional horizontal theories of harm, it has largely secured court victories. But where it challenged mergers based on non-horizontal theories of harm, it mostly lost in court, except for a partial victory in its vertical merger challenge of Illumina/Grail. It has also struggled to secure victories where it litigated over the sufficiency of remedies offered by merging parties. Since the publication of Biden’s Antitrust Gamble, the FTC suffered another loss, this time seeing its serial acquisition claim in FTC v. USAP dismissed as to the private equity fund defendant, a blow to its anti-private equity agenda.
Obama (’09-16) | Trump (’17-20) | Biden (’21-22) | |
% of Second Requests Leading to Challenge, of which: | 83.2% | 78.5% | 73.2% |
Negotiated Settlement | 49.2% | 41.0% | 26.8% |
Abandonment/Restructuring | 25.5% | 28.8% | 29.5% |
Litigation | 8.5% | 8.8% | 17.0% |
Setbacks in labor market enforcement efforts. Biden has suffered significant setbacks in pursuit of its aggressive labor market enforcement agenda. Although the DOJ has obtained a guilty plea and a pretrial diversion agreement, it has lost four different trials in which it brought criminal charges based on no-poach and wage-fixing allegations. Meanwhile, the FTC’s controversial rulemaking prohibiting non-compete covenants in employment contracts faces a 1-1 score in court, with one federal court upholding the rule while another preliminarily enjoined it.
Scorecard in the crusade against tech: TBD. The Biden Administration has been on an antitrust crusade against tech, pursuing monopolization cases against Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and, most recently, Ticketmaster/LiveNation. In several of these cases, the Administration pushes the boundaries of US monopolization law in a more European direction or second-guesses merger clearance decisions of prior Administrations. With most of those cases still pending, it remains to be seen what Biden’s legacy will be in its crusade against tech companies.
President Biden is taking a gamble with his Administration’s aggressive approach; if pushed too far, it could lead to course corrections by courts or future Administrations that constrain rather than further his antitrust ambitions in the long term. For an in-depth discussion of the Biden Administration’s antitrust track record, take a look at Biden’s Antitrust Gamble by Daniel Bitton and Carol Liu.

To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Tags
News & Insights
News & Insights
NJSBA Annual Meeting and Convention 2025
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
CompLaw Antitrust West Coast Conference 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AHLA Health Care Transactions Program 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
ACI 21st Annual Paragraph IV Conference
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
ABA 73rd Annual Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
AIPLA CLE Web Series: Hot Topics in Chemical & Biotech Patent Practice
Speaking Engagement
17th Annual Practitioners' Think Tank on ITC Litigation & Enforcement
Speaking Engagement
Intellectual Property
Antitrust Enforcement Trends and Policies in 2025: Unfair Competition, Merger Policies, Premerger Procedures
Webinar
Antitrust
CompLaw Nordic 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
Compounding Problems: Recent Decisions on Tirzepatide Highlight Interplay Between FDA Anti-Compounding Enforcement and Private Intellectual Property Rights
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property