Axinn Successfully Obtains Dismissal for Zydus Pharmaceuticals
October 13, 2015
Axinn successfully obtained the dismissal of an amended complaint brought against its client, Zydus, in ongoing patent litigation concerning generic versions of Abilify®(aripiprazole). Otsuka markets Abilify® and filed an amended complaint against Zydus adding infringement allegations related to U.S. Patent No. 8,759,350.
Axinn attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the allegations relating to the ‘350 patent, and the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted this motion on October 13. Specifically, the Court dismissed Otsuka’s direct and contributory infringement claims with prejudice. The Court also dismissed Otsuka’s induced infringement claim without prejudice, concluding that the amended complaint did not offer allegations directed at intentional or specific actions necessary to plead induced infringement. Otsuka may amend its induced infringement claim, but the Court cautioned Otsuka to consider “the litany of evidentiary deficiencies identified in the Court’s TRO Opinion.” Axinn previously succeeded in obtaining a denial of Otsuka’s TRO motion on the ‘350 patent in April.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property