Axinn Obtains Victory for CWW and Chubb in Long-Running Contempt Proceeding
March 22, 2019
On March 22, after successfully defeating a claim in excess of $180 million against ACE in the Cayman Islands that was brought in violation of an anti-suit injunction, Axinn turned the tables and pursued the parties who had prosecuted and financed that litigation. In July 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania found those parties in civil contempt, stating that their “outrageous behavior is an affront to the Courts of the United States.” The funder of the Cayman litigation filed a panoply of motions to undo the Pennsylvania court’s contempt ruling, and avoid his responsibility for over $15 million in compensatory sanctions to Axinn’s client. In response, the court ordered the parties to engage in significant additional discovery. On March 22, 2019, after multiple rounds of briefing concerning the impact of that discovery on the record of the funder’s contempt, the court accepted the Axinn team’s arguments that the funder’s attempt to set aside the contempt ruling was legally irrelevant and baseless. Relying on the record the Axinn team developed, the court held that the evidence overwhelmingly discredited the litigation funder’s arguments, which the court repeatedly characterized as “excuses” and “nonsense.”
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property