Axinn Obtains Summary Judgment Victory Against FDA
October 22, 2012
A team of attorneys from Axinn successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of Watson Laboratories, Inc. in litigation against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The court’s ruling, which is under seal, includes an order that paves the way for the company to bring its generic diabetes drug to market.
The case involved a dispute over the 180-day “first-to-file” marketing exclusivity for generic versions of the multi-billion dollar product Actos® (pioglitazone hydrochloride). FDA had denied exclusivity to Watson in August 2012, instead approving one of Watson’s competitors. In the summary judgment motion, Axinn argued that FDA’s decision should be reversed and that Watson should be entitled to share the marketing exclusivity period.
Today, Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued an order granting Watson Laboratories’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and ordered that the FDA “approve Watson Laboratories' ANDA for generic pioglitazone effective immediately so that Watson may participate in what remains of the shared exclusivity period previously awarded to other generic manufacturers of the drug.”
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property