Connecticut Supreme Court Unanimously Affirms Summary Judgment for Axinn Client
February 10, 2014
Axinn successfully defended a multimillion dollar contract dispute for insurance broker Brown & Brown with a unanimous victory in the Connecticut Supreme Court.
The case related to Brown & Brown’s 2004 purchase of assets from a Connecticut-based insurance broker. Axinn previously won dispositive motions on all issues in the case in the Connecticut Superior Court’s Complex Litigation Docket for Brown & Brown and successfully defended that victory in the Connecticut Appellate Court.
The Connecticut Supreme Court then granted review of whether the Appellate Court correctly determined that Brown & Brown could not hinder performance of a contract through alleged conduct that took place before the contract was signed. The Court’s unanimous decision sided with Brown & Brown on both the procedural and substantive components of that issue, bringing more than five years of litigation to a successful conclusion for Brown & Brown. In the process, the Court provided important guidance on several issues of appellate procedure for Connecticut litigants.
Brown & Brown was represented by an Axinn team that included Mark Alexander, who argued in the Connecticut Supreme Court, and John Tanski, who argued in the Connecticut Appellate Court.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property