Axinn Files Lawsuit to Compel Attorney General to Maintain the Confidentiality of Subpoenaed Materials
September 1, 2006
Axinn has filed a landmark declaratory judgment lawsuit on behalf of Brown & Brown, Inc. against the Connecticut Attorney General. The suit asks the Court to interpret a statute providing that material subpoenaed in antitrust investigations "shall not be available for public disclosure." The Attorney General claims that the statute permits disclosure of subpoenaed materials whenever he believes it will advance his investigation or any litigation arising from it. For years, this issue has plagued companies that respond to subpoenas in Connecticut since the Attorney General's interpretation would permit trade secrets and other confidential commercial and financial information to be disclosed to competitors, customers, potential customers and the general public.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property