Axinn Successfully Obtains Dismissal of Certain Patent Claims asserted against Zydus Pharmaceuticals in Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HEC Pharma Co., Ltd.
December 19, 2016
A team of Axinn attorneys successfully obtained a dismissal of certain patent claims brought by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals against several defendants, including Axinn client Zydus Pharmaceuticals. On December 7, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss the claims of patent infringement relating to U.S. Patent No. 8,853,156, which is alleged by Boehringer to cover its antidiabetic drug Tradjenta (linagliptin).
At issue in the matter was whether claims that recite a method of treating metabolic diseases by administering DPP-IV inhibitors to certain patients are patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Defendants challenged the asserted certain of the ‘156 patent on grounds that they recite a natural law and are therefore patent ineligible. The plaintiffs argued that the claims were patent eligible because they recite treating specific populations using non-natural compounds and alter the state of the body in a new and useful way.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property