Axinn Successful in Protecting FDA Approval of Generic Versions of Otsuka’s Abilify
April 29, 2015
A team of attorneys from Axinn successfully intervened on behalf of Zydus Pharmaceuticals on the side of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. District Court in Maryland to oppose Otsuka Pharmaceuticals’ motion for a temporary restraining order. Otsuka sought the order to prohibit FDA from granting approvals for any generic versions of Otsuka’s $4 billion prescription brand drug aripiprazole, which Otsuka markets under the name Abilify®.
Otsuka claimed a seven-year market exclusivity for Abilify under the orphan drug designation, as the FDA approved Abilify for the use in the treatment of Tourette’s disorder in pediatric patients. Otsuka also alleged that generic competition is likely to cause the drug maker irreparable harm. Today, U.S. District Judge George Hazel denied Otsuka’s motion for a temporary restraining order, allowing generic versions of Abilify to enter the market. The court’s ruling will provide significant cost savings for consumers as generic competition will cause drug prices to decrease. The ruling also reaffirms FDA’s discretion in allowing generics to carve out indications from their labels that are protected by marketing exclusivity.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property