Summary Judgment Motion Granted for Axinn Client UPMC
March 27, 2019
Axinn obtained a significant victory in its representation of UPMC, a world-renowned health care provider and insurer, in an antitrust case brought by a former vendor of UPMC WorkPartners, a UPMC subsidiary providing worker’s compensation insurance and Third Party Administration (“TPA”) services to employers throughout Pennsylvania. On March 27, 2019, the District Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania granted Axinn’s motion for summary judgment on all six antitrust counts, including claims under Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act for conspiracy, group boycott, monopolization, attempted monopolization, and exclusive dealing. Axinn successfully argued that the plaintiff failed to define any relevant markets, lacked antitrust injury, and failed to prove foreclosure or harm to competition. The Court also found that UPMC did not have market power or a dangerous probability of achieving a monopoly in the provision of worker’s compensation insurance or TPA services. Axinn’s resounding win led the Court to refuse supplemental jurisdiction over a remaining common law unfair competition claim, resulting in a full dismissal of the federal suit. The Axinn team was led by partners Richard Dagen and Tom Rohback, assisted by Dan Oakes and Brandon Boxbaum.
To subscribe to our publications, click here.
Featured Insights
Featured Insights
American Bar Association 2025 Asia-Pacific Conference
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
NBA Commercial Law Section 38th Annual Corporate Counsel Conference
Sponsorship
Antitrust
GCR Live: Law Leaders Global 2025
Speaking Engagement
Antitrust
The 32nd Annual Marketing Partner Forum
Event
SABA North America Corporate Counsel Retreat 2025
Sponsorship
Antitrust
Axinn Antitrust Insight: FTC Announces Revised HSR Thresholds for 2025
Client Alerts
Antitrust
Four Axinn Thought Leadership Pieces Nominated for the Antitrust Writing Awards
Awards & Recognitions
Antitrust
Merger Remedies Back in Vogue Under Trump
Media Mentions
Antitrust
Three Takeaways from the Initial Determination at the ITC Regarding Standard Essential Patents in the 1380 Investigation
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property
A POSA’s Motivation Is Not Required To Be the Same as the Inventor’s in Evaluating Obviousness
Axinn Viewpoints
Intellectual Property